I need a co-founder

If anyone has experience in medical devices/electronics/being awesome then please skip the rest and e-mail me at christopher@snapforty.com.

More and more I have realised over the last few weeks that I need a co-founder. Many startup accelerators now avoid entirely or, or strongly discourage, single founders and up till now I only half understood why.

I am of the opinion that, usually, two minds are better than one and a great solution to a problem can come out of passionate discussion. Thats one of the key benefits I see of having a great co-founder. Obviously there are the other benefits too - sharing of stress, sharing of work load, balancing out skills - but for me one of the key benefits is just being able to talk things out. That being said, ultimately a decision has to be made. 

I read an article a few years ago that talked about the loneliness of starting a startup, and I never really understood what that meant. I never felt "lonely" while running Dizeo, but it was a very different startup to snap40. For some reason, I do feel the loneliness now. The loneliness of making a decision on your own, of choosing a path on your own. The loneliness of crossing a very dark and imposing desert with no map entirely on your own. That is part and parcel of starting a company and it isn't to say I am indecisive or not ready to take on the responsibility myself, I am and I will, but as snap40 begins to pick up pace I realise that I would be strengthened, and my startup would be strengthened, by having a co-founder. 

snap40 has some great advisors, people I can count on and talk to, but they aren't the same as having a co-founder there, someone who lives and breathes the company as I do now. They don't love building that company and cherish the ups and downs. The challenge is how do you find that person? How do you make sure they are the right fit for you and for your startup? Thats what makes me cautious and thats what makes me scared. 

Ultimately, I want to build snap40 into a globally successful business, a positive force both for the economy and, most importantly, for patients and healthcare staff (since we are a healthcare technology company). To do that, I want to make sure we are as strong as possible in all areas, and part of that is having a fantastic management team. I now strongly believe that having a co-founder, particularly in the early stages, is crucial to that team. 

I'm now cautiously looking for a co-founder for snap40. I'm not actively looking, I'm not searching, but if someone does come along thats right then they will be most welcome. 

Bridging the divide between healthcare data and privacy

The industrial revolution changed the world over a period of eighty years, but the technology revolution has changed the world in a fraction of that time. Consider how much has changed since just the year 2000. We now share vast amounts of information about ourselves and conduct a significant proportion of our lives online. Privacy has become one of the biggest issues of today due to a combination of a legal, political and ethical system that has not kept pace with such rapid change as well as a society largely split on what should and should not be shared.

Healthcare has, to a certain extent, lagged behind the revolution occurring in other areas but it is quickly catching up and this has lead to significant controversy around the sharing of healthcare data. Just a couple of weeks ago it was revealed that Booz Allen, the former employer of Edward Snowden, was developing bio-surveillance technology using devices such as the FitBit. The premise behind the project was to track population dynamics and specifically the spread of disease, but it is easy to see why this could get people concerned.

Personally, I strongly believe in the benefits of using bio-sensors for epidemiological purposes as well as for enhancing patient care. It is worth pointing out that I have a dog in this race, I am the founder of a startup developing wearables to pre-emptively detect deteriorations in patients so that interventions can be put in place faster, saving lives. I strongly believe that collecting and using healthcare data in this way has the potential for good, to improve healthcare and to increase patient safety. 

Patient health records are another area of significant controversy. The coalition government has been attacked in the media over its handling of Care.data, a plan to bring NHS health records into a database for use in research. Concerns quickly emerged over use of this data by private firms, especially insurance firms, and upload of the data has now been delayed until the autumn of 2014. 

The issue at heart for me is three-fold. First, we have a society which is divided between those who do understand technology and the sharing of data, and those who don't. Second, because things have moved on so quickly, we don't have suitable legal and ethical safeguards in place at a governmental level. Third, we have a number of people in public office who themselves do not understand technology and data, yet push forward policy and guidance in this area. 

There are enormous benefits both at a societal and individual level in using the data we can get from health records and bio-sensors. Unfortunately, there is also significant potential for abuse and this has sadly, in my opinion, over-shadowed the benefits. The Edward Snowden/NSA/GCHQ affair has furthered the view that governments cannot and should not be trusted. When Booz Allen talk about using bio-surveillance, it is hard not to think of the dark side of this debate, a government tracking you through a wristband, knowing your every move. 

However, lets consider the positive side for a second. What if we had a health service that used data from multiple sources including the Met Office to predict load on services? What if we had patients who were able to be alerted earlier that they needed to see their doctor? What if we were able to pull together health records with our growing knowledge of genetics and begin to introduce truly personalised medicine, where we give a drug not based on a flow chart in a guideline, but based on your genome? 

Health data offers us the potential to make our society better, healthier and stronger but we need to do better at educating the general public. We need to be completely open and transparent. We need to incentivise the right people to get into public office and work for the civil service where they can bring change. We need a legal and ethical system that safeguards and enshrines the right to privacy so that people can trust both the public and private sector to use their data for good and we need to make sure that boards are legally bound to handle this data in a socially and ethically responsible way.

We have the potential to solve the biggest problems of today

The tech industry has been half-enraged and half-mesmerised by the recent news that Yo, an app which does nothing more than allow you to send Yo to your friends, had received $1.2 million dollars in funding. Some expressed anger that their own startups hadn't received funding, others used it as further evidence, as if it was required, that we are in the midst of a bubble, and others tried to justify the investment with figures. 

Whilst I never like to criticise any business or founder, it saddens me that some of the worlds most driven, focussed, intelligent and inspiring individuals don't focus their time on solving the real problems our society faces. It may well be that Yo has the user engagement and growth that justifies such an investment on purely those terms, but, to me, that is a narrow outlook.

Consider that the World Health Organisation has estimated that around 70% of the US population is overweight or obese. In Scotland, rates of liver disease are almost double the rates of the rest of the UK, and they continue to rise. Healthcare staff are more and more having to deal with microbes resistant to multiple antibiotics due to persistent over-prescription and lack of investment by big pharma. In Glasgow, many now live with a lower life expectancy than many parts of Africa, with Africa itself gripped by high rates of HIV and hunger. 

Outside of trying to build a successful business, I am a medical student and I have witnessed first hand some of the problems we face. The NHS is frequently under-staffed and over-worked and is faced with an explosion of diabetes an a population that is living longer. This is on a backdrop of bureaucracy, poor communication and collaboration and frequently poor data. 

The problems facing us - energy, food, water, health, education - require big solutions and we are just starting to see some of these solutions come out of a new wave of startup businesses. For me, innovation and invention doesn't come from the top, but it comes from the bottom. It comes from disruptive startup businesses who dare to try something new, who dare to think a bit differently. 

I therefore find it difficult to see individuals who could focus their time and effort solving these problems, instead put their efforts into something like Yo. This may seem pretentious, and I re-iterate I am not diminishing what Yo, or any other similar startup, has and is achieving. I am simply pointing out that another instant messaging app, however novel or 'hipster', isn't going to solve what really needs solved.

We need to think big, see the real problems that are out there and go solve them. For my part, I hope to stick by this philosophy and play my part.